Feds go for lowest common denominator approach in delivering redress for abuse survivors

Published: Comments:
Community Law & Safety Political

This is an archived copy of an article. It is online for informational purposes only.
Social:   

Lawyers for abuse survivors say the Federal Government have gone for the lowest common denominator approach to secure sign-up for the national redress scheme, with the Government today conceding that any Senate push to address abuse survivor concerns and lift compensation amounts would be overridden by state agreements.

Maurice Blackburn Abuse Law Principal Michelle James said the Federal Government's national redress scheme from the outset had been a significant departure from the recommendations of the Royal Commission, and it was now evident that this had been deliberate to ensure sign-on from states and institutions.

"Minister Dan Tehan is quoted today conceding that if 'the Senate were to unilaterally alter key elements of the agreed scheme, it may place the whole national redress scheme at risk[1]' – a comment that makes clear that the priority has been about securing sign-on, irrespective of that meaning the lowest common denominator on redress for survivors," Ms James said.

"This is a farcical situation, legislation for a national scheme is currently being reviewed by a Senate Committee, but its findings – including any push to raise the cap on compensation to $200,000 as advocated by survivors – won't be worth the paper it's written on, because the national scheme will simply be superseded by what the states have agreed to.

"If the Federal Government had ensured from the outset that its national redress scheme was consistent with the recommendations of the Royal Commission, including a $200,000 cap on compensation, we wouldn't be having this debate now – we would be working towards implementing a fair scheme that all states and institutions would also have to follow.

"Instead what we now have is the Federal Government playing politics with its deal with New South Wales and Victoria to undermine any attempt by the Senate and survivors to strengthen its own scheme in line with the Royal Commission's recommendations.

"The question that must be asked is: what is the point of having a Senate Committee process to deal with the national redress scheme, if the end result is ignoring that Committee's findings because any national scheme will ultimately need to mirror what the states agreed to.

"It is a ridiculous situation and a lowest common denominator approach from the Federal Government – abuse survivors deserve much better," she said.

 
Maurice Blackburn Lawyers :
76 Wises Road, Maroochydore
07 5430 8700
07 5443 6711
Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
Showing 10+ recent articles for this business
MediVac bill to ensure timely medical treatment for refugees and asylum seekers in offshore detention 12 February 2019 | Social justice law firm Maurice Blackburn has tonight welcomed the passing of a bill in the House of Representatives to get sick people out of offshore detention for medical assessment and treatment in Australi... More information...
AWU raids trial set to get underway tomorrow in the Federal Court 09 February 2019 | The case is being run by Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, who are acting on behalf of the AWU, and was brought following unprecedented Australian Federal Police (AFP) raids on the union's headquarters, which were... More information...
Banking Royal Commission report levels playing field for consumers against big banks and insurers 04 February 2019 | Today's banking Royal Commission final report will help to level the playing field for consumers in an industry that for too long has been skewed towards the interests of big banks, financial institutions and... More information...
Kids off Nauru a long overdue step, more must be done for those who remain in offshore detention 03 February 2019 | Social justice law firm Maurice Blackburn has today said the move to remove children from Nauru has taken too long, with significant damage already done for many children and families as a result of lengthy... More information...
Research shows harm caused by cyber hate and harassment, prompting urgent call for law reform 28 January 2019 | Newly published polling on the economic costs and destructive impacts of online harassment and cyber hate has again reinforced the urgent need for overdue legal reforms to keep online users safe, according to... More information...
Committee recommendations for improved stillbirths data welcome but greater reforms needed to improve safety 05 December 2018 | Lawyers have today welcomed the handing down of a Senate Committee report into stillbirth research education, including key recommendations to prioritise the development of national comprehensive perinatal deaths... More information...
Statement regarding update in case of Osman Faruqi v Mark Latham 26 November 2018 | A settlement has been reached in the case of Osman Faruqi v Mark Latham, with Mr Latham removing offensive statements made about Mr Faruqi as well as agreeing to pay him damages plus legal costs. More information...
Employers risk fines if they refuse leave for union rally 14 October 2018 | Employers who refuse to allow their employees to take leave to attend this month's Australia Needs A Payrise union rally may be breaking Australia's workplace laws. More information...
Federal call for investigation into silicosis risks welcome, states must follow suit 11 October 2018 | Lawyers for silicosis sufferers have today welcomed reports that the Federal Government has called for state workplace regulators to immediately investigate risks of silicosis for stonemasons, saying action was... More information...
Scouts apology meaningless if not matched by action for abuse survivors 05 October 2018 | Lawyers for abuse survivors have today dismissed an apology from Scouts Australia to survivors of abuse, saying such efforts ring hollow given how Scouts NSW in particular continues to treat those seeking compe... More information...



Social:   
comments powered by Disqus

All articles submitted by third parties or written by My Sunshine Coast come under our Disclaimer / Terms of Service