Some school anti-bullying programs may do more harm than good

Published:

New QIMR Berghofer analysis of research on school anti-bullying programs has concluded that programs that encourage bystanders to intervene may inadvertently harm the children they are aimed at protecting.

Lead author and psychologist Dr Karyn Healy from QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute’s Child and Youth Mental Health Group reviewed leading international research on the effectiveness of anti-bullying programs over the past decade.

She said global research showed that bullying prevention programs overall result in about a 20 per cent reduction in bullying in schools and a 15 per cent drop in victimisation. However, in secondary schools the average benefit was zero.

“Unfortunately, this means that programs in high schools are just as likely to make bullying worse as they are to reduce bullying,” Dr Healy said.

“Different types of strategies have different results. However, this has been difficult for researchers to tease out as most programs involve multiple strategies. More research is needed to understand more about what works and what doesn’t.”

Dr Healy said the complexity of most programs and the inclusion of several elements could explain why it was difficult to pinpoint what was not working.

Most programs incorporate many different elements including the introduction of a whole-school anti-bullying policy, student lessons, improved discipline, playground monitoring, training for staff and parents, and work with bullies, victims, or peer bystanders.

Dr Healy said research showed the most effective anti-bullying programs focus on improving behaviour management, improved playground supervision, and parent involvement.

“However a lot of current programs focus on involving peer bystanders to get involved in bullying, which has not been shown to reduce bullying. A summary study showed that, overall, programs that encourages uninvolved bystanders to get involved was associated with significant increases in victimisation,” she said.

“Having lots of peers involved makes the situation more public, which can be damaging to the social reputation of victims. Having a trained bystander step in also prevents the victim from handling a situation themselves, and may make them look weak in the eyes of the bully.

“Getting peers involved in helping resolve bullying has an intuitive appeal. However, we now have some evidence, which shows that at least some of these programs make bullying worse, which can add to the distress of victims.

“Students who want to step in shouldn’t be discouraged, but the research suggests students should not be actively trained to intervene, because there is no evidence this works, and some evidence this may, in some cases, cause harm.”

Dr Healy, who has specialised in school-based bullying for 25 years, said although not every program that encouraged peer involvement made bullying worse, caution was needed in selecting programs that were proven to help.

“Unfortunately the findings from the research haven’t as yet been picked up by anti-bullying program providers, schools or governments, many of which continue to endorse programs that encourage peers to get involved and attempt to resolve situations of bullying,” she said.

“Until we know a specific program that encourages peer bystanders is helpful for victims, we need to exercise caution.

“It’s important that decision makers at school and government levels ensure the programs they initiate in schools are backed up by evidence-based research. This means only using programs that have been specifically and carefully evaluated. Just because it sounds like a good idea doesn’t mean it will necessarily help. It could make things a whole lot worse for some victims.

“We have come a long way in identifying the mental health challenges caused by bullying, and accepting the need for programs to educate children, parents and teachers of the dangers. Now, we need to ensure we put in place programs and practices that help rather than harm victims.”

The study findings have been published in the journal Child Development Perspectives.

According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare bullying refers to any intentional and repeated behaviour which causes physical, emotional or social harm to a person who has, or is perceived to have, less power than the person who bullies.

 
Children Community Education & Schools Health & Wellness Science & Research Teenagers & Young Adults
Social:   

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute :
PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Brisbane
07 3845 3752
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Showing 10+ recent articles for this business
Every pregnancy helps reduce endometrial cancer risk 17 November 2020 | New QIMR Berghofer research has found each additional pregnancy a woman experiences, including those that result in miscarriage, can help reduce her risk of developing endometrial cancer. More information...
No genetic signs that hearing loss causes Alzheimer’s disease 14 October 2020 | New QIMR Berghofer and QUT research has found there is no strong genetic evidence that hearing loss causes Alzheimer’s disease, despite both conditions sharing a significant number of genetic variants. More information...
Some school anti-bullying programs may do more harm than good 23 October 2020 | New QIMR Berghofer analysis of research on school anti-bullying programs has concluded that programs that encourage bystanders to intervene may inadvertently harm the children they are aimed at protecting. More information...
Melanoma risk not as obvious as some think 20 October 2020 | New QIMR Berghofer research has found almost a quarter of the Queensland population underestimates their risk of developing potentially deadly melanomas – with those at highest risk also the worst at predicting... More information...
Study finds ways to reduce the risk of common Queensland skin tumour 08 October 2020 | New QIMR Berghofer research has found limiting sun exposure, quitting smoking and cutting down on alcohol could help Queenslanders avoid developing the common skin tumour keratoacanthoma (KA). More information...
Researchers get a better grip on left and right handedness 29 September 2020 | In the largest study of its kind to date, researchers have identified 48 genetic variants that influence if a person is left-handed, right-handed or ambidextrous. More information...
New potential weapon found in battle against cancer and inflammatory diseases 24 August 2020 | QIMR Berghofer-led research has discovered the pivotal role played by an important immune system protein that, if harnessed through immunotherapy, has the potential to treat a wide range of cancers and inflamma... More information...
Brain cancer clinical trial gives hope to patients 13 August 2020 | Queensland researchers have found that patients who received a cellular immunotherapy for the deadly brain cancer glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a clinical trial on average survived longer than would have been... More information...
Pessimistic outlook on life linked to life expectancy 29 July 2020 | A new QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute study has found people who are strongly pessimistic about the future are at greater risk of dying earlier than those who are not pessimists. More information...
New keys found for unlocking head and neck cancer treatment 28 July 2020 | QIMR Berghofer scientists say the discovery of new cellular immunotherapy targets for a deadly type of head and neck cancer, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), could lead to better survival rates. More information...


comments powered by Disqus

All articles submitted by third parties or written by My Sunshine Coast come under our Disclaimer / Terms of Service